At
the Lakeview Inquiry Celebration, I was unfortunately not afforded
the opportunity to sit in on specific social studies seminars.
Instead, I was able to sit in on several math seminars. However, this
is not to say that the presentations were not valuable. On the
contrary, I found the information presented in these seminars to be a
formative experience in designing inquiry projects.
The
most interesting, albeit possibly controversial seminar I attended
was one on working with students to reinforce basic math skills that
might have been lost or never learned. The presenter pointed out that
many students are attempting to do math without a firm grasp on the
basics – addition, multiplication, division, and subtraction. The
presenter decided to use timed drill-and-practice assessments to hone
these skills with accuracy, precision, and speed.
The
questions I had based on this action research presentation revolved
around the use of the timed tests. Since they were 1 minute, 40
question tests, I desired to know how many completed them or came
close in that time frame (answer: zero; highest score was ~32). Also,
I was curious about the implications of such timed tests. I remember
in elementary school, I really dreaded such things. It was not that I
was particularly bad at these skills – I was simply a little
slower. I think that timed assessments can be damaging to the
confidence to students who work more slowly. Basically, my issue with
these sorts of assessments is that there is little differentiation.
However, I do acknowledge that there is indeed a problem in which
middle school students do lack these basic math skills. Thus, I
thought the presentation was strong on the whole.
The
key things that I learned from this inquiry were mainly about the
actual structure and creation of the research methodology and
questions. First, it became increasingly clear that one should choose
a topic which suits your interests. There was a marked difference in
the demeanor of the interns who used topics that they were clearly
passionate about. Along with that is the idea that one should design
inquiry projects fit your context. The presentations I watched all
involved research questions that formed organically from the issues
or phenomena observed in their respective classrooms.
Making one's inquiry public is an excellent decision. Research should always be shared with future researchers, as they could expand on your inquiry in order to develop solutions to 21st century problems. Also, informing others of inquiry can help teachers learn about effective strategies for making classrooms excellent places to learn.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.